Websites: PrometheanPAC.com, PrometheanAction.com, https://donate.prometheanaction.com/
Friends, Promethean Action is Going to Washington
We will be there from Monday March 24 – Friday March 28th
Please Call Your Congressman to Set up a Meeting for Us.
And Please Donate to Help Sponsor the Trip
Here is the link to donate.
Click the link below to Donate to Promethean Action . Thanks! https://donate.prometheanaction.com/
Thanks for all of your support!!
Read Below for Details of How To Set up the Meeting.
Call Gerald at 323-210-9483 with any questions or help you need for the meeting set up
Our group is being asked to contact our Congressmen using the script below:
Dear Representative _________
I work with a group Promethean Action which will have a team of activists in Washington, D.C. the week of March 24-28. I am asking you or someone on your staff to meet with them to discuss two critical matters:
- Keeping President Trump alive, and
- making America a manufacturing superpower.
Promethean Action has significant intelligence and years of experience relevant to both of these areas. Can a meeting sometime during that week be arranged?
Please call, text, or email me at________
Less than two months into Donald Trump’s historic second administration, it is clear that he is carrying out a revolutionary transformation. But it is equally clear that many of our Congressmen, including Republicans, don’t yet grasp the magnitude of this revolution. President Trump has broken with Wall Street economics and is returning to the American System, as we outline in our pamphlet, The American System 2.0.
That’s why Promethean Action is sending a team of experienced organizers to Capitol Hill during the week of March 24-28 to meet with as many members of Congress or their staff as possible.
Here’s where you come in.
Will you call your Congressman and request that they, or a staff member, meet with our organizers? (And, yes, even call Democrats—unless they are completely nuts.) We are much more likely to get a meeting if the request comes from a constituent.
One of our activists worked off the outline below and successfully set up meetings in three of her Congressional delegation’s offices.
You can call the Capitol Hill switchboard at 202-224-3121 or call your local office. If you get the ball rolling, we will follow up.
The most important thing you can do is help us get these meetings, but donations to support our team are appreciated. We also intend to hand deliver our pamphlets to every office on the Hill. Thank you, Gerald Pechenuk
Resources for the meetings.
The Judicial Coup:
The so-called “judges” are stepping completely outside their branch of government to try to usurp President Trump’s authority.
Article from: https://x.com/amuse/status/1902082081124954282
Curbing Judicial Obstruction with Impeachment
The judiciary’s independence is sacrosanct, but it was never meant to be an unchecked autocracy. While Article III grants lifetime tenure to federal judges contingent on “good Behaviour,” it does not render them immune to consequences when they systematically abuse their power. Today, the increasing use of nationwide injunctions by activist judges has become a favored weapon of the Left to obstruct President Trump’s duly enacted policies, often without a clear constitutional or statutory basis. If unchecked, this trend threatens the balance of power between the branches of government. The Founders provided a remedy for judicial misconduct: impeachment. While removal by the Senate may be politically impossible, the process itself—lengthy, costly, and reputationally damaging—can serve as an effective deterrent against overreach. Republicans must be willing to wield impeachment strategically, not necessarily to remove but to punish and deter judges who act as unelected policymakers.
Hamilton, in Federalist No. 81, made clear that impeachment was intended as a check on judges who engage in “a series of deliberate usurpations” of the authority of the other branches. Judges who repeatedly issue nationwide injunctions against the executive branch are precisely such usurpers. A nationwide injunction is, in effect, a judicial veto on the president’s agenda. It allows a single unelected judge—often forum-shopped by left-wing litigants—to impose their policy preferences over the entire nation, circumventing the democratic process. While the Supreme Court has signaled skepticism toward this practice, lower courts continue to wield it aggressively.
A strategy of impeachment, even if the Senate does not convict, can curb this judicial activism. The moment a judge is impeached by the House, their professional life is consumed by defending their record. They must lawyer up, face grueling hearings, and endure the stain of impeachment on their legacy. Historically, even the threat of impeachment has influenced judicial behavior. In 1996, federal judge Harold Baer Jr. reversed his own controversial decision after bipartisan calls for his impeachment gained traction. Impeachment, therefore, serves as a powerful mechanism of accountability even without removal.
Critics may argue that impeachment should be reserved for criminal misconduct, but this is a narrow and ahistorical interpretation. The Constitution defines impeachable offenses as “high crimes and misdemeanors,” a term the Founders deliberately left broad to encompass abuses of power. Gerald Ford once quipped that an impeachable offense is “whatever a majority of the House considers it to be at a given moment in history.” This flexibility is precisely why impeachment remains an essential tool. When a judge repeatedly and willfully obstructs the president’s ability to govern through legally dubious nationwide injunctions, that judge has violated the public trust and warrants impeachment proceedings.
Moreover, the process of impeachment serves an important signaling function. Judges observing their peers face impeachment for nationwide injunctions will be less inclined to issue such orders themselves. A judiciary that fears political backlash will be more restrained in inserting itself into policy disputes. While Democrats have normalized lawfare against Trump—weaponizing indictments and civil suits to exhaust his political viability—Republicans have largely failed to adopt similar tactics. Impeachment, in this context, is not an abuse of power but a measured response to judicial excesses that threaten constitutional governance.
Historically, judicial impeachments have been rare but impactful. The impeachment of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase in 1804, while unsuccessful, helped delineate the boundaries of judicial partisanship. More recent examples, such as the impeachment and removal of Judge Walter Nixon for perjury, demonstrate that the process remains viable when misconduct is clear. While current political realities make Senate convictions unlikely, the mere act of impeachment puts judges on notice. Judges are not above scrutiny. If they wish to issue sweeping injunctions that override the executive branch, they should be prepared to defend their decisions under the harsh spotlight of an impeachment inquiry.
To be clear, this is not an argument for impeaching any judge who rules against a conservative policy. The standard should be a demonstrable pattern of activist rulings, particularly those that extend beyond traditional judicial authority to halt executive actions nationwide. Congress must establish a clear framework: if a judge issues multiple nationwide injunctions in cases where statutory or constitutional justification is weak, that judge becomes a legitimate target for impeachment. This is not a partisan weapon but a constitutional safeguard against judicial imperialism.
Republicans must recognize that they are engaged in a political struggle where only one side is playing by Marquess of Queensberry rules. If Democrats can launch impeachment proceedings against Trump on flimsy grounds, there is no reason Republicans should hesitate to hold unelected judges accountable for egregious abuses of power. The Constitution provides the tool. It is time to use it. The judiciary must be reminded that their role is to interpret the law—not to dictate policy for an entire nation. Impeachment, wielded strategically, can restore that proper balance.
** End **
Here’s How Chief Justice John Roberts Should Respond To The Rogue Justices
** End **
